He spent quite a lot of time so I would encourage you to join the Discord and take a look at his findings regarding which custom Windows 10 ISOs performed the best in his testing. This is a complex question because each ISO tends to favor different games and different hardware as shown in this video made by Derek, therefore, your decision should be purely based on your personal testing.Īnother great idea is to check The World of PC Discord channel called kevs-w10-charts where you have a handy thread made by Kev. Which Custom Windows 10 ISO Should You Go For? If you however are comfortable with troubleshooting and dealing with problems then these builds will result in the best latency and inputs you can currently get.Ī lot of the 1709 builds circulating on the internet could also be discontinued as well since a lot of software simply does not work with them anymore so be careful what you are installing. The main recommendation is to stay away from 1709 ( FoxOS, RekOS, EVA) builds if you have no clue about custom Windows installs or simply do not want to troubleshoot basic issues that might arise from these builds missing components you might otherwise use.
Most custom Windows 10 installs are based on the following builds: 1709, 1809, 21H1/21H2.
The general rule of thumb is that the older the Windows build the better the latency will be since you will benefit from fewer services, telemetry, and no Meltdown/Spectre patches.Īt the same time, the older the build, the fewer components it will have resulting in a lot of services you currently use being broken or unusable. Another important aspect of knowing which custom ISO to get and which ones you should stay away from is directly related to how old the custom build is.
0 kommentar(er)
